Channelpedia

PubMed 2447945


Referenced in: none

Automatically associated channels: Kv2.1 , Slo1



Title: Desensitization of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor from rat brain: two distinguishable receptors on the same membrane.

Authors: D J Cash, K Subbarao

Journal, date & volume: Biochemistry, 1987 Dec 1 , 26, 7556-62

PubMed link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2447945


Abstract
Transmembrane chloride flux mediated by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor can be measured with a mammalian brain homogenate preparation containing sealed membrane vesicles. The preparation can be mixed rapidly with solutions of defined composition. Influx of 36Cl- tracer initiated by mixing with GABA was rapidly terminated by mixing with bicuculline methiodide. The decrease in the isotope influx measurement due to prior incubation of the vesicle preparation with GABA, which increased with preincubation time and GABA concentration, was attributed to desensitization of the GABA receptor. By varying the time of preincubation with GABA between 10 ms and 50 s with quench-flow technique, the desensitization rates could be measured over their whole time course independently of the chloride ion flux rate. Most of the receptor activity decreased in a fast phase of desensitization complete in 200 ms (t 1/2 = 32 ms) at saturation with GABA. Remaining activity was desensitized in a few seconds (t 1/2 = 533 ms). These two phases of desensitization were each kinetically first order and were shown to correspond with two distinguishable GABA receptors on the same membrane. The receptor activities could be estimated, and the faster desensitizing receptor was the predominant one, giving on average ca. 80% of the total activity. The half-response concentrations were similar, 150 and 114 microM for the major and minor receptors, respectively. The dependence on GABA concentration indicated that desensitization is mediated by two GABA binding sites. The fast desensitization rate was approximately 20-fold faster than previously reported rates while the slower desensitization rate was slightly faster than previously reported rates.