Referenced in: none

Automatically associated channels: HCN2

Title: Inner activation gate in S6 contributes to the state-dependent binding of cAMP in full-length HCN2 channel.

Authors: Shengjun Wu, Weihua Gao, Changan Xie, Xinping Xu, Christina Vorvis, Farzana Marni, Amber R Hackett, Qinglian Liu, Lei Zhou

Journal, date & volume: J. Gen. Physiol., 2012 Jul , 140, 29-39

PubMed link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22689828

Abstract
Recently, applications of the patch-clamp fluorometry (PCF) technique in studies of cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) and hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-regulated (HCN) channels have provided direct evidence for the long-held notion that ligands preferably bind to and stabilize these channels in an open state. This state-dependent ligand-channel interaction involves contributions from not only the ligand-binding domain but also other discrete structural elements within the channel protein. This insight led us to investigate whether the pore of the HCN channel plays a role in the ligand-whole channel interaction. We used three well-characterized HCN channel blockers to probe the ion-conducting passage. The PCF technique was used to simultaneously monitor channel activity and cAMP binding. Two ionic blockers, Cs(+) and Mg(2+), effectively block channel conductance but have no obvious effect on cAMP binding. Surprisingly, ZD7288, an open channel blocker specific for HCN channels, significantly reduces the activity-dependent increase in cAMP binding. Independent biochemical assays exclude any nonspecific interaction between ZD7288 and isolated cAMP-binding domain. Because ZD7228 interacts with the inner pore region, where the activation gate is presumably located, we did an alanine scanning of the intracellular end of S6, from T426 to A435. Mutations of three residues, T426, M430, and H434, which are located at regular intervals on the S6 α-helix, enhance cAMP binding. In contrast, mutations of two residues in close proximity, F431A and I432A, dampen the response. Our results demonstrate that movements of the structural elements near the activation gate directly affect ligand binding affinity, which is a simple mechanistic explanation that could be applied to the interpretation of ligand gating in general.