Channelpedia

PubMed 19225180


Referenced in Channelpedia wiki pages of: none

Automatically associated channels: Kv2.1



Title: Functional characterization and in silico docking of full and partial GluK2 kainate receptor agonists.

Authors: Anne-Marie L Fay, Christopher R Corbeil, Patricia Brown, Nicolas Moitessier, Derek Bowie

Journal, date & volume: Mol. Pharmacol., 2009 May , 75, 1096-107

PubMed link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19225180


Abstract
Two structural models have been developed to explain how agonist binding leads to ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) activation. At alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) iGluRs, full and partial agonists close the agonist-binding domain (ABD) to different degrees whereas agonist-induced domain closure is apparently fixed at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Although kainate (KA) iGluRs are thought to behave like AMPA receptors, the issue has not been formally tested because of the paucity of available receptor agonists. Here we identify a series of structurally related full and partial agonists at GluK2 (formerly GluR6) KARs and predict their docking mode using the in silico ligand-docking program FITTED. As expected, the neurotransmitter L-Glu behaved as a full agonist but modest reduction (e.g., L-serine or L-aspartate) or elongation (e.g., L-alpha-aminoadipate) in chain length generated weak partial agonists. It is noteworthy that in silico ligand-docking predicted that most partial agonists select for the closed and not, as expected, the open or intermediate conformations of the GluK2 ABD. Experiments using concanavalin-A to directly report conformations in the intact GluK2 receptor support this prediction with the full agonist, L-Glu, indistinguishable in this regard from weak partial agonists, D- and L-Asp. Exceptions to this were KA and domoate, which failed to elicit full closure as a result of steric hindrance by a key tyrosine residue. Our data suggest that alternative structural models need to be considered to describe agonist behavior at KARs. Finally, our study identifies the responsiveness to several neurotransmitter candidates establishing the possibility that endogenous amino acids other than L-Glu may regulate native KARs at central synapses.