Title: Fast Na+ channels in smooth muscle from pregnant rat uterus.

Authors: N Sperelakis, Y Inoue, Y Ohya

Journal, date & volume: Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 1992 Apr , 70, 491-500

PubMed link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1323377

Abstract
Smooth muscle cells normally do not possess fast Na+ channels, but inward current is carried through two types of Ca2+ channels: slow (L type) Ca2+ channels and fast (T type) Ca2+ channels. Whole-cell voltage clamp was done on single smooth muscle cells isolated from the longitudinal layer of the 18-day pregnant rat uterus. Depolarizing pulses, applied from a holding potential of -90 mV, evoked two types of inward current, fast and slow. The fast inward current decayed within 30 ms, depended on [Na]o, and was inhibited by tetrodotoxin (TTX) (K0.5 = 27 nM). The slow inward current decayed slowly, was dependent on [Ca]o (or Ba2+), and was inhibited by nifedipine. These results suggest that the fast inward current is a fast Na+ channel current and that the slow inward current is a Ca2+ slow channel current. A fast-inactivating Ca2+ channel current was not evident. We conclude that the ion channels that generate inward currents in pregnant rat uterine cells are TTX-sensitive fast Na+ channels and dihydropyridine-sensitive slow Ca2+ channels. The number of fast Na+ channels increased during gestation. The averaged current density increased from 0 on day 5, to 0.19 on day 9, to 0.56 on day 14, to 0.90 on day 18, and to 0.86 pA/pF on day 21. This almost linear increase occurs because of an increase in the fraction of cells that possess fast Na+ channels. The Ca2+ channel current density was also higher during the latter half of gestation. These results indicate that the fast Na+ channels and Ca2+ slow channels in myometrium become more numerous as term approaches, and we suggest that the fast Na+ current may be involved in spread of excitation. Isoproterenol (beta-agonist) did not affect either ICa(s) or INa(f), whereas Mg2+ (K0.5 = 12 mM) and nifedipine (K0.5 = 3.3 nM) depressed ICa(s). Oxytocin had no effect on INa(f) and actually depressed ICa(s) to a small extent. Therefore, the tocolytic action of beta-agonists cannot be explained by an inhibition of ICa(s), whereas that of Mg2+ can be so explained. The stimulating action of oxytocin on uterine contractions cannot be explained by a stimulation of ICa(s).